Results 1 to 50 of 53

Thread: Canon 100-400 Ghosting problems

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rnclark View Post
    Steve (or anyone else with filters that compromise image quality).

    I am doing a study of filters on image quality and would like examples of known filters that compromise image quality. I have one polarizing filter that does that and I found the two sides of the filter are not parallel. So if anyone has such filters and would like to donate them to my study (which I will put on my non-commercial web site), please contact me off-thread. I would like to see if any of these filters have characteristics people could quickly assess before buying. You can find other articles on my web site regarding image quality.

    Roger,

    I was recently told digital camera sensors do not fair well with fliters. The reasoning... lens elements are miniscus and filters flat, causing back-scattering of light.

    Chas

  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Jay Gould's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In the whole wide world!
    Posts
    2,788
    Threads
    332
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Interestingly, further to Chuck's comment that Canon does not officially recommend a UV filter which is also called a UV Protective Filter, the image from my 16-35 manual specifically contains a cautionary warning from Canon about the risk of not using a protective filter. If you do not use a protective filter and as a result you get dust and water inside the lens, have you voided your warranty?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics