Like It? Or Not?

BirdPhotographers.net

Help Support BirdPhotographers.net:

Arthur Morris

Founding Publisher
Staff member
Admin
Moderator
Joined
Dec 13, 2007
Messages
32,488
Location
Indian Lake Estates, FL
BPN-Brown-Pelican-3200-Pacific-race-bill-and-hind--neck-detail-_7R46025--La.-Jolla.----CA.jpg

Pacific Race Brown Pelican — pre-breeding plumage — carpet neck & bill detail

This image was created 6 January 2020 while scouting for the 2020 San Diego IPT. I used the tripod-mounted Sony FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS lens, the Sony FE 1.4x Teleconverter, and the 61-MP Sony Alpha a7R IV Mirrorless Digital Camera Body. ISO 400. Exposure determined by Zebras with ISO on the rear dial: 1/1000 sec. at f/8 (stopped down one stop) in Manual mode. AWB at 10:02am on sunny morning. Center Zone Continuous/tracking AF was active at the moment of exposure.

I like doing body-parts-abstracts. To see a tight crop of the a7r IV detail and a more traditional frame of the same bird, see the blog post here.

As for the image, don't be shy; all comments are welcome and appreciated.

with love, artie
 
Sorry Artie , I appreciate great detail in the subject but the missing eye doesn't float my boat, lots of posterisation - never seen so much in the blue background.
 
Brown-Pelican-1920-redo----Pacific-race-bill-and-hind--neck-detail-_7R46025--La.-Jolla.----CA.jpg

Sorry Artie , I appreciate great detail in the subject but the missing eye doesn't float my boat, lots of posterisation - never seen so much in the blue background.

See the more standard image at the blog post linked to above. Thanks for pointing out the posterization. I must have screwed up the JPEG creation and I think that I know how. The repost here should be fine.

with love, artie
 
I normally would like to see the eyes, but this seems to work still because of the lines. The repost looks much better. What was the difference in your processing? Asking because I have had posterization a few times as well after doing some NR.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Kurt. I am pretty sure that I accidentally started with a relatively small JPEG and re-processed that. Yikes! I went back and began with the master file and all was well. I will be doing a video on creating quality JPEGs soon. See the blog for details in a few days.

with love, artie
 
Last edited:
I like it too, SKA:cheers:

Image design is great. This is something unusual, not what we see every day. Inclusion of the eye would distract the viewer who would miss out on those lovely patterns. Striking colours and detail, it would print well on canvas:w3

Warmest regards,
 
I like it. I like it a lot. Abstracts like this are fun to look for, and to create. Obviously not everyone's cup of tea, but the same can be said of blurs, silhouettes, and many other styles.
 
Artie, from a purely abstract perspective it's nice. Being an Avian forum, we're so used to seeing the eyes (and necessarily so) but getting outside of that mindset, yeah it's cool and different.

The posterization is odd for sure, but if you processed a jpg then perhaps that's the issue.

You might also try one eliminating the tip of the beak. I know that may sound weird. but use the tones and textures with the diagonal line and I think it would make people pause for a moment and add interest.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top