Hi Deb,
re:
I am not experienced enough to critique your photography.
Disagree. Surely you can tell me what you like and/or what you do not like (and why...)
So, hopefully, I will ask questions as to your choices so that I might learn. Is that acceptable in this forum?
Surely.
I will start with - beautiful detail in the blacks and whites/creams. Am I drawn to the photograph? yes.
The above is a good start to a critique
Questions-
Did you take the photo at a low angle to reduce shadows or does that create them? Or is it just another way of getting a better angle of the bird.
None of the above. We are on a cliff well above the Pacific. I could have created quite a similar image standing but this year the water closer to shore had big patches of brown scuzz on the surface. Getting lower helped in two ways: 1-eliminating the brown scuzz--always a good move! 2-the background in the image, aka the Pacific Ocean, had less detail (waves, chop, etc.) in it than it would have had I been standing because the ocean was farther away.... That is a general rule: the farther away you can effectively "place" the BKGR the softer and more o-o-f it will be.
How did you decide on the crop?
I framed carefully to eliminate all of the rock that the bird was resting on. For this one I wanted all rock, no bird. Purity.
The large wing in the front almost acts as a barrier to the rest of the photo but the eye/face and bill draw you to the rest of the photo.
I chose this subject because of the uncommon posture. As Danny says below, the diagonal strengthens the image.
Thanks for the great questions. Hopefully the boys and girls will learn a lot. Let me know if there is anything unclear.
Danny; do you get them in breeding plumage?